From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Daniel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 23, 2022
No. 05-22-00114-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 23, 2022)

Opinion

05-22-00114-CV

02-23-2022

IN RE JAMES T. DANIEL AND KRISTI A. DANIEL, Relators


Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-52305-2021

Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE

Before the Court is relators' February 11, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus in which they challenge the trial court's temporary order changing the conservator with the exclusive right to determine the children's primary residence. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Based on our review of the petition, real party in interest's response, and the record, we conclude that relators have failed to show their entitlement to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Daniel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 23, 2022
No. 05-22-00114-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 23, 2022)
Case details for

In re Daniel

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JAMES T. DANIEL AND KRISTI A. DANIEL, Relators

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Feb 23, 2022

Citations

No. 05-22-00114-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 23, 2022)