From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dahlin

United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington
Mar 14, 2022
0980 2:21CR00069-SAB-1 (E.D. Wash. Mar. 14, 2022)

Opinion

0980 2:21CR00069-SAB-1

03-14-2022

Stephen Andrew Dahlin


PETITION FOR WARRANT OR SUMMONS FOR OFFENDER UNDER SUPERVISION

PETITIONING THE COURT

To incorporate the violations contained in this petition in future proceedings with the violations previously reported to the Court on 01/20/2022.

On December 16, 2021, an officer with the U.S. Probation Office in Spokane, Washington, reviewed a copy of the conditions of supervision with Stephen Dahlin as outlined in the judgment and sentence. He signed the judgment acknowledging the requirements.

The probation officer believes that the offender has violated the following conditions of supervision:

Violation Number

Nature of Noncompliance

9

Standard Condition #9: If you are arrested or questioned by a law enforcement officer, you must notify the probation officer within 72 hours. Supporting Evidence: On March 1, 2022, Stephen Dahlin allegedly violated standard condition number 9 by failing to notify the assigned probation officer he had been arrested. On February 25, 2022, while in abscond status with both the WA DOC and the U.S. Probation Office, Stephen Dahlin was arrested during a traffic stop. On March 1, 2022, the offender had a hearing with the WA DOC to address his alleged violations, and was subsequently sentenced to time served. Although the arrest warrant issued by this Court was still outstanding at the time, due to a glitch in the system, Mr. Dahlin was released from custody on that date. After his untimely release from custody, on March 1, 2022, Mr. Dahlin made no attempt to contact this officer or the U.S. Probation Office to advise that he had arrested. On March 2, 2022, as required by the WA DOC, the offender was to have checked-in with his community corrections officer (CCO) within 24 hours of his release from custody; Mr. Dahlin failed to report on that date as required. According to information received by the undersigned, the offender informed his assigned CCO he would not be reporting because he was aware that there was a federal warrant for his arrest and he didn't “feel like going to j ail today.” The offender's whereabouts were unknown until he was located and arrested by the U.S. Marshals Services on March 11, 2022.

The U.S. Probation Office respectfully recommends the Court to incorporate the violations contained in this petition in future proceedings with the violations) previously reported to the Court.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Amber M.K. Andrade U.S. Probation Officer

THE COURT ORDERS

[ ] No. Action

[ ] The Issuance of a Warrant

[ ] The Issuance of a Summons

[X] The incorporation of the violation(s) contained in this petition with the other violations pending before the Court.

[ ] Defendant to appear before the Judge assigned to the case.

[X] Defendant to appear before the Magistrate Judge.

[ ] Other


Summaries of

In re Dahlin

United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington
Mar 14, 2022
0980 2:21CR00069-SAB-1 (E.D. Wash. Mar. 14, 2022)
Case details for

In re Dahlin

Case Details

Full title:Stephen Andrew Dahlin

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington

Date published: Mar 14, 2022

Citations

0980 2:21CR00069-SAB-1 (E.D. Wash. Mar. 14, 2022)