From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Currence

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 23, 2018
No. 18-1498 (4th Cir. Jul. 23, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-1498

07-23-2018

In re: KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE, Petitioner.

Kareem Jamal Currence, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:18-ct-03038-BO) Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kareem Jamal Currence, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kareem Jamal Currence petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that a United States Magistrate Judge has unduly delayed his civil rights action, and he seeks an order from this court directing the judge to act. The present record reveals no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Currence

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 23, 2018
No. 18-1498 (4th Cir. Jul. 23, 2018)
Case details for

In re Currence

Case Details

Full title:In re: KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 23, 2018

Citations

No. 18-1498 (4th Cir. Jul. 23, 2018)