From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cummings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 508869.

November 18, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Harold Cummings, Otisville, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Peters, J.P., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.


Following an investigation, petitioner, a prison inmate, received a misbehavior report charging him with assaulting an inmate and violent conduct based on an altercation with a laundry porter. A tier III disciplinary hearing was held, after which petitioner was found guilty of violent conduct, but not guilty of assaulting an inmate. That determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, after which petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report and the testimony from both the authoring correction officer and the confidential informant provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Monroe v Fischer, 73 AD3d 1304; Matter of Sanders v Haggett, 72 AD3d 1372, 1372-1373). Petitioner's contention that he could not have been in the area of the incident at the time it was alleged to have occurred raised an issue of credibility to be resolved by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Williams v Fischer, 75 AD3d 706, lv granted 15 NY3d 891; Matter of Mitchell v Bezio, 69 AD3d 1281, 1281-1282).

Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be either unpreserved or without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Cummings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Cummings

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HAROLD CUMMINGS, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 18, 2010

Citations

78 A.D.3d 1391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8403
910 N.Y.S.2d 700