Summary
holding that where "the court did not eliminate reunification as a permanent plan for the children, the court was not required to make the findings mandated by Section 7B-906.2(b), and it did not err in failing to do so"
Summary of this case from In re I.A.Opinion
No. COA16-1283.
07-18-2017
Holcomb and Stephenson, LLP, by Carol J. Holcomb, Chapel Hill, for petitioner-appellee Orange County Department of Social Services. Robert W. Ewing, Clemmons, for respondent-appellant mother. Administrative Office of the Courts, by GAL Appellate Counsel Matthew D. Wunsche, for guardian ad litem.
AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.