From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re C.S.L.B.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Jul 18, 2017
803 S.E.2d 429 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017)

Summary

holding that where "the court did not eliminate reunification as a permanent plan for the children, the court was not required to make the findings mandated by Section 7B-906.2(b), and it did not err in failing to do so"

Summary of this case from In re I.A.

Opinion

No. COA16-1283.

07-18-2017

In the MATTER OF: C.S.L.B., C.P.R.B., S.C.R.B.

Holcomb and Stephenson, LLP, by Carol J. Holcomb, Chapel Hill, for petitioner-appellee Orange County Department of Social Services. Robert W. Ewing, Clemmons, for respondent-appellant mother. Administrative Office of the Courts, by GAL Appellate Counsel Matthew D. Wunsche, for guardian ad litem.


AFFIRMED IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.


Summaries of

In re C.S.L.B.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Jul 18, 2017
803 S.E.2d 429 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017)

holding that where "the court did not eliminate reunification as a permanent plan for the children, the court was not required to make the findings mandated by Section 7B-906.2(b), and it did not err in failing to do so"

Summary of this case from In re I.A.
Case details for

In re C.S.L.B.

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF: C.S.L.B., C.P.R.B., S.C.R.B.

Court:Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Date published: Jul 18, 2017

Citations

803 S.E.2d 429 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

In re I.A.

This Court has consistently held, albeit in unpublished opinions, that where reunification remains part of…

In re S.G.

In support of his argument, Respondent-Father cites to decisions by this Court recognizing that the "…