From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Csehy

Supreme Court of Georgia.
Feb 2, 2015
296 Ga. 492 (Ga. 2015)

Opinion

No. S15Y0372.

02-02-2015

In the Matter of Rand J. CSEHY.

Graham & Jensen, Jason W. Graham, for Csehy. Paula J. Frederick, Gen. Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Asst. Gen. Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.


Graham & Jensen, Jason W. Graham, for Csehy.

Paula J. Frederick, Gen. Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Asst. Gen. Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.In April 2014, Rand J. Csehy (State Bar No. 199756) pled nolo contendere to two counts of possession of a controlled substance, OCGA § 16–13–30, and one count of possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, OCGA § 16–11–106. He was sentenced as a first offender. Csehy filed a petition for voluntary discipline seeking a one-to-two-year suspension. On September 15, 2014, while his petition was pending, the Superior Court of Cobb County, noting during an appearance that Csehy was disheveled and unable to stand without support, ordered a drug test, which showed the presence of illegal drugs in his system. The court held him in contempt and incarcerated him for five days. Immediately thereafter, the State Bar filed an amendment to its response to Csehy's petition, requesting that it be denied and that a special master be appointed. This Court appointed a special master, John Wayne Moulton, on September 24, 2014. On October 6, 2014, this Court issued an opinion rejecting Csehy's petition for voluntary discipline, see In the Matter of Csehy, 295 Ga. 853, 764 S.E.2d 540 (2014). On October 29, 2014, the special master convened a hearing in Csehy's case, but Csehy failed to appear. The special master issued his report and recommended that, because Csehy was convicted of three felonies, he should be disbarred, see Bar Rule 8.4(a)(2) (violation of Bar Rules for lawyer to be convicted of felony) and Bar Rule 8.4(b)(1)(ii) (conviction includes an accepted plea of nolo contendere) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, Bar Rule 4–102(d).

We have reviewed the entire record of the proceedings and agree with the special master that disbarment is the appropriate sanction. Accordingly, the name of Rand J. Csehy hereby is removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in the State of Georgia. He is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4–219(c).

Disbarred.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

In re Csehy

Supreme Court of Georgia.
Feb 2, 2015
296 Ga. 492 (Ga. 2015)
Case details for

In re Csehy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Rand J. CSEHY.

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia.

Date published: Feb 2, 2015

Citations

296 Ga. 492 (Ga. 2015)
769 S.E.2d 93

Citing Cases

In re Fry

See, e.g., In the Matter of Csehy, 296 Ga. 492, 769 S.E.2d 93 (2015) (lawyer disbarred for felonies involving…

Csehy v. State

Following his 2012 arrest in Fulton County for drugs and firearms violations, Csehy pled nolo contendere in…