Opinion
533803
04-14-2022
In the Matter of the Claim of Monique Cromwell, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Monique Cromwell, Ellenville, appellant pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.
Calendar Date: March 18, 2022
Monique Cromwell, Ellenville, appellant pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Garry, P.J., Aarons, Pritzker, Ceresia and McShan, JJ.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 25, 2021, which dismissed claimant's appeal from a decision of the Administrative Law Judge as untimely.
By decision dated December 14, 2020, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) ruled, among other things, that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits during a particular time period because she was not totally unemployed. Claimant appealed the ALJ's decision by letter dated January 29, 2021. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board informed claimant that her appeal was untimely but that it would review her request to determine whether good cause had been shown for the delay. By decision filed February 25, 2021, the Board dismissed claimant's appeal, finding that the appeal was untimely and that claimant failed to provide any explanation for the delay. This appeal by claimant ensued.
We affirm. "Labor Law § 621 (1) provides that an appeal to the Board from a decision of an ALJ must be made within 20 days of the mailing or personal delivery of the decision, and this time requirement is strictly construed" (Matter of Page [Commissioner of Labor], 152 A.D.3d 857, 858 [2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Watts [Commissioner of Labor], 179 A.D.3d 1379, 1379 [2020]; see Matter of Paladino [Commissioner of Labor], 140 A.D.3d 1496, 1496-1497 [2016]). The record reflects that claimant neither appealed the ALJ's decision within the statutory time period nor offered any explanation for the delay. Accordingly, the merits of the ALJ's decision are not properly before us, and the Board's dismissal of claimant's appeal as untimely will not be disturbed (see Matter of Sainpaulin [Commissioner of Labor], 186 A.D.3d 1853, 1853 [2020]; Matter of Watts [Commissioner of Labor], 179 A.D.3d at 1379; Matter of Paladino, 140 A.D.3d at 1497).
Garry, P.J., Aarons, Pritzker, Ceresia and McShan, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.