From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Crisonino

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 24, 2010
991 A.2d 214 (N.J. 2010)

Opinion

March 24, 2010.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-275, concluding that EDWARD J. CRISONINO of WESTMONT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EDWARD J. CRISONINO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Over-sight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Crisonino

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 24, 2010
991 A.2d 214 (N.J. 2010)
Case details for

In re Crisonino

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD J. CRISONINO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 24, 2010

Citations

991 A.2d 214 (N.J. 2010)
991 A.2d 214

Citing Cases

State v. Street

We are cognizant that there were serious problems related to the representation afforded Street by that…

In re Pinnock

In criminal matters, an attorney's failure to file an appeal is deemed an aggravating factor because the…