From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re C.R.H. v. Juv. Off., St. Louis Cty

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Feb 18, 2003
99 S.W.3d 32 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81249

February 18, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Thomas DePriest, Judge.

David Allyn Shaller, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Robin Ranson Vannoy, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.

Celeste Leritz Endicott, St. Louis, MO, for Juvenile.

Before William H. Crandall, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Glenn A. Norton, J.



ORDER


David Homan (Father) appeals from a trial court judgment terminating his parental rights to his minor child, C.R.H. (Child), pursuant to Section 211.447 RSMo. (2000). Father argues that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that termination is in Child's best interest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that termination of parental rights is in Child's best interest. In re A.S., 38 S.W.3d 478, 486 (Mo.App.S.D. 2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

In re C.R.H. v. Juv. Off., St. Louis Cty

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Feb 18, 2003
99 S.W.3d 32 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

In re C.R.H. v. Juv. Off., St. Louis Cty

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of: C.R.H., a minor. DAVID HOMAN, Appellant, v. JUVENILE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Feb 18, 2003

Citations

99 S.W.3d 32 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)