From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Crenshaw

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 19, 2020
No. 05-20-00549-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 19, 2020)

Opinion

No. 05-20-00549-CV

06-19-2020

IN RE SANDRA CRENSHAW, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Partida-Kipness, and Nowell
Opinion by Justice Schenck

Before the Court is relator's May 26, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus in which it appears relator, a vexatious litigant, seeks to compel the trial court to allow her to proceed as a vexatious litigant. Relator's petition does not comply with the requirements for filing a petition for mandamus, and because she has filed no record, the Court is unable to conduct a meaningful review of her claims. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3, 52.7. Further, entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Here, relator has failed to meet this burden. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE 200549F.P05


Summaries of

In re Crenshaw

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 19, 2020
No. 05-20-00549-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 19, 2020)
Case details for

In re Crenshaw

Case Details

Full title:IN RE SANDRA CRENSHAW, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jun 19, 2020

Citations

No. 05-20-00549-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 19, 2020)