From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Creditor — Morequity, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland, at Baltimore
Jan 3, 2011
Case No.: 10-36789 - NVA (Bankr. D. Md. Jan. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 10-36789 — NVA.

January 3, 2011

Gregory Thomas Wheet, Davidsonville, MD.


STATEMENT OF REVIEW


The above identified Reaffirmation Agreement has been reviewed. It appearing that all requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 524 have been complied with, counsel for debtor has made the certification set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 524(c)(3), and Part D of the Reaffirmation Agreement is completed in a manner not significantly disparate from the sworn statements of the debtor in Schedules I and J and creates no presumption of undue hardship under 11 U.S.C. § 524(m). No hearing, determination, or order is required.

Per § 524(c)(6)(B) approval of reaffirmation agreement is not required for consumer debt secured by real property, even cases in which the individual is not represented by an attorney.

Date signed December 30, 2010


Summaries of

In re Creditor — Morequity, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland, at Baltimore
Jan 3, 2011
Case No.: 10-36789 - NVA (Bankr. D. Md. Jan. 3, 2011)
Case details for

In re Creditor — Morequity, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In re: Chapter: 7 Creditor — Morequity, Inc. Reaffirmation — 14

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland, at Baltimore

Date published: Jan 3, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 10-36789 - NVA (Bankr. D. Md. Jan. 3, 2011)