From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Craner Tractor Implement Co.

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 18, 1989
110 B.R. 124 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1989)

Opinion

Bankruptcy No. 84-00561. Adv. No. 87-0043. Civ. A. No. 88-1159.

July 18, 1989.


STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING POSTPETITION INTEREST TO INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE


WHEREAS this action is before this Court on the appeal of the United States of America of the "Memorandum-Decision, Findings Of Fact, Conclusion Of Law And Order" ("Memorandum-Decision") of United States Bankruptcy Judge Stephen D. Gerling, dated July 15, 1988, 110 B.R. 111; and

WHEREAS the issue on appeal in this action as to whether Bankruptcy Code Section 506(b), 11 U.S.C. permits the payment of postpetition interest on an oversecured federal tax claim is identical to the issue which was recently decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 1026, 103 L.Ed.2d 290 (1989), wherein the Supreme Court held that an oversecured federal tax claim is entitled to postpetition interest, NOW,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED among the parties to this action by their undersigned counsel (each counsel having signed a separate signature page which is annexed hereto) that based on the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Ron Pair, supra, the Memorandum-Decision of Bankruptcy Judge Gerling is reversed to the extent it denied the Internal Revenue Service postpetition interest on its oversecured tax claim. Accordingly, the Internal Revenue Service is entitled, pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 506(b), to postpetition interest on its oversecured tax claim as provided by 26 U.S.C. § 6621 and 6622.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Craner Tractor Implement Co.

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 18, 1989
110 B.R. 124 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1989)
Case details for

In re Craner Tractor Implement Co.

Case Details

Full title:In re Byron CRANER d/b/a Craner Tractor Implement Co., and Barbara J…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jul 18, 1989

Citations

110 B.R. 124 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1989)

Citing Cases

In re Prichard

"[M]arshaling assets is an equitable doctrine developed to prevent injustice to junior creditors and foster…

In re America's Hobby Center, Inc.

Because marshaling concerns itself with "competing property interests of liens," state law governs its…