From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Craig

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Sep 8, 2022
No. 03-22-00543-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2022)

Opinion

03-22-00543-CV

09-08-2022

In re Carl Craig


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EDWARD SMITH, JUSTICE

Relator Carl Craig seeks an original writ of habeas corpus challenging his pre-trial confinement as unlawful. This Court has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters; our original jurisdiction to entertain applications for writ of habeas corpus extends solely to the actions of judges in civil cases. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(d). Our habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate only. In re Hall, No. 03-17-00778-CV, 2017 WL 5985541, at *1 (Tex. App.-Austin Nov. 30, 2017, orig. proceeding). Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge of those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.05.

Accordingly, we dismiss Craig's application for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Craig

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Sep 8, 2022
No. 03-22-00543-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2022)
Case details for

In re Craig

Case Details

Full title:In re Carl Craig

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Sep 8, 2022

Citations

No. 03-22-00543-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2022)