From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Courtnall

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
May 1, 2014
89 A.3d 1064 (D.C. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14–BG–103.

2014-05-1

In re Kyle M. COURTNALL, Respondent.


Bar Registration No. 468109, BDN: 471–13.
BEFORE: THOMPSON, Associate Judge, and PRYOR and NEBEKER, Senior Judges.

ORDER


PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent's license to practice law in the state of Virginia for a period of 15 months, this court's February 12, 2014, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Kyle M. Courtnall is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 15 months. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent's suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g).


Summaries of

In re Courtnall

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
May 1, 2014
89 A.3d 1064 (D.C. 2014)
Case details for

In re Courtnall

Case Details

Full title:In re Kyle M. COURTNALL, Respondent.

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Date published: May 1, 2014

Citations

89 A.3d 1064 (D.C. 2014)