From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Costley

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Aug 23, 2012
No. 10-12-00290-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-12-00290-CV

08-23-2012

IN RE CHARLOTTE COSTLEY


Original Proceeding


MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this original proceeding, Relator seeks mandamus relief relating to an administrative law judge's apparently adverse decision on her claim for Social Security disability benefits. A state court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a federal administrative law judge. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004). We lack jurisdiction over this original proceeding and dismiss it.

Relator's petition for writ of mandamus has several procedural deficiencies. It does not include the certification required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3(j). See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j). It lacks an appendix and a certified or sworn record, as required by Rules 52.3(k) and 52.7(a)(1). See id. 52.3(k), 52.7(a)(1). And, it lacks proof of service. A copy of all documents presented to the Court must be served on all parties to the proceeding and must contain proof of service. Id. 9.5; 52.2. Because of our disposition and to expedite it, we will implement Rule 2 and suspend these rules in this proceeding. Id. 2.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Petition dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed August 23, 2012
[OT06]


Summaries of

In re Costley

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Aug 23, 2012
No. 10-12-00290-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2012)
Case details for

In re Costley

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CHARLOTTE COSTLEY

Court:TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Aug 23, 2012

Citations

No. 10-12-00290-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

In re Yeomans

In re Newsome, No. 03-13-00009-CV, 2013 WL 238713, at *1 (Tex. App.-Austin Jan. 18, 2013, orig. proceeding…