From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Costanza

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Jul 27, 2018
NO. 2018 CW 0059 (La. Ct. App. Jul. 27, 2018)

Opinion

NO. 2018 CW 0059

07-27-2018

IN THE MATTER OF THE SUCCESSION OF MATTHEW COSTANZA


In Re: Co-Executors of the Estate of Matthew Costanza, Doyle and Jackie Boudreaux, applying for supervisory writs, 2'3rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 17909. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., McDONALD, HIGGINBOTHAM, CHUTZ AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. Genuine issues of material fact remain as to the testator's intent and mental capacity, thus precluding summary judgment. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 966(A)(3).

VGW

TMH

AHP

McDonald and Chutz, JJ., dissent and would grant the writ. Relators presented sufficient evidence to show that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The burden then shifted to Respondent, Beryle Smith Ramsey, to show that there is a genuine issue of material fact or that Relators are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. La. Code Civ. P. art. 966(D)(1). The only admissible evidence submitted by Respondent is her own self-serving testimony, which is insufficient to defeat summary judgment. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 967(B). Therefore, Relators', Doyle and Jackie Boudreaux, Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted, dismissing all claims raised against them and the Succession of Matthew Costanza by Beryle Smith Ramsey. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

In re Costanza

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Jul 27, 2018
NO. 2018 CW 0059 (La. Ct. App. Jul. 27, 2018)
Case details for

In re Costanza

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE SUCCESSION OF MATTHEW COSTANZA

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 27, 2018

Citations

NO. 2018 CW 0059 (La. Ct. App. Jul. 27, 2018)