From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Coronel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 16, 2016
140 A.D.3d 1408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

06-16-2016

In the Matter of the Claim of Hugo CORONEL, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Hugo Coronel, Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for respondent.


Hugo Coronel, Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for respondent.

Before: PETERS, P.J., McCARTHY, EGAN JR., LYNCH and CLARK, JJ.

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 10, 2014, which disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for a manufacturing company for approximately two months. He had attendance problems and failed to report to work after December 12, 2013. According to claimant, he stopped working because he had to report to jail following his conviction of driving with a suspended license. The Department of Labor found that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his job without good cause. This determination was upheld by an Administrative Law Judge following a hearing and later by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. “A claimant who is absent from work due to incarceration has been held disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits” (Matter of Richardson [Commissioner of Labor], 30 A.D.3d 870, 871, 816 N.Y.S.2d 688 [2006] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Turlev [American Axle & Mfg.-Commissioner of Labor], 296 A.D.2d 763, 764, 744 N.Y.S.2d 775 [2002] ). Inasmuch as claimant admitted that his incarceration prevented him from continuing to work for the manufacturing company, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Coronel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 16, 2016
140 A.D.3d 1408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Coronel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Hugo CORONEL, Appellant. Commissioner of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 16, 2016

Citations

140 A.D.3d 1408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
140 A.D.3d 1408
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4748