From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Complaint of Jana E. II, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Mar 13, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13CV308 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13CV308

03-13-2014

IN RE THE COMPLAINT AND PETITION OF JANA E. II, INC. AS OWNER OF THE SANTA ROSA, ITS ENGINES, TACKLE, ETC. IN A CAUSE OF EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST NON-APPEARING CLAIMANTS

Pending before the Court is the Unopposed Motion of Petitioner Jana E II, Inc. for a Judgment by Default against all non-appearing claimants. (D.E. 12). The Magistrate Judge entered a "Memorandum and Recommendation to Grant Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment." (D.E. 20). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed.

When no timely objection to a Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).

Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 20), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Petitioner Jana E II, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED. (D.E. 12).

It is further ORDERED that Petitioner Jana E II, Inc. be granted judgment against all non-appearing claimants and that, as to these claims only, the Petitioner, Jana E II, Inc., be exonerated from any further liability. In addition, the surety, RLI Insurance Company, is released from any further obligation pursuant to its Letter of Undertaking filed in the captioned matter with respect to these non-appearing claimants only.

It is further ORDERED that all person or entities, other than Claimants Jon Helsel and Texas Mutual Insurance Company, are forever barred and foreclosed from asserting claims against the Petitioner, Jana E II, Inc., in connection with any claims that have been or could be asserted as a result of any claimed injuries while the SANTA ROSA was in navigable waters on a voyage that commenced on or about June 8, 2013, and terminated on or about June 9, 2013.

Subsequent to the Magistrate Judge's memorandum and recommendation, Texas Mutual Insurance Company filed a Motion for Leave to File Answer and Claim. (D.E. 22). A hearing was held on February 24, 2014, at which all interested parties indicated the motion was unopposed. After considering the motion, Texas Mutual Insurance Company was permitted to file a late filed claim. (D.E. 24).

__________

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Complaint of Jana E. II, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Mar 13, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13CV308 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2014)
Case details for

In re Complaint of Jana E. II, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE THE COMPLAINT AND PETITION OF JANA E. II, INC. AS OWNER OF THE SANTA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Date published: Mar 13, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13CV308 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2014)

Citing Cases

In re Beverly Indus.

Humphreys v. Hal Antillen, N.V., No. 93-3799, 1994 WL 682811, at *2 (E.D. La. Jan. 31, 1994) (quoting World…