From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gringo Honeymoon, Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Jan 9, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-00124 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 9, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-00124

01-09-2019

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF GRINGO HONEYMOON, CORP., as owner and/or owner pro hac vice of the M/V GRINGO HONEYMOON FOR EXONERATION FROM AND/OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

Pending before the Court are Claimant American Plastic Fab & Machine, Inc.'s Objections to the Magistrate's Memorandum and Recommendation Concerning Claimant American Plastic Fab & Machine, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction ("Objections"). Dkt. 66. On October 31, 2018, Claimant American Fab & Machine, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. 28) was referred to Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Dkt. 55. On November 27, 2018, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 62) recommending that Claimant American Fab & Machine, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. 28) be DENIED.

On December 10, 2018, Claimant American Fab & Machine, Inc. filed its Objections. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge's] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection [has been] made." After conducting this de novo review, the Court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id.; see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

The Court has carefully considered the Objections; the responses; the Memorandum and Recommendation; the pleadings and summary judgment record; and the briefing and arguments of the parties. The Court ACCEPTS Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation and ADOPTS it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that:

(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 62) be APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and

(2) Claimant American Fab & Machine, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. 28) be DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED and ENTERED this 9th day of January, 2019.

/s/_________

GEORGE C. HANKS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Gringo Honeymoon, Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Jan 9, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-00124 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 9, 2019)
Case details for

In re Gringo Honeymoon, Corp.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF GRINGO HONEYMOON, CORP., as owner and/or…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

Date published: Jan 9, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-00124 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 9, 2019)

Citing Cases

In re High Tide Enters.

This means that a claimant who fails to appear in the limitation action is forever prohibited from bringing a…