From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Columbia Univ. Tuition Refund Action

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 29, 2022
1:20-cv-03208 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-03208 (JMF)

03-29-2022

IN RE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TUITION REFUND ACTION


[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT

Jesse M. Furman United states District Judge

WHEREAS, the Parties to the above-captioned putative class action (the “Action”) entered into a Stipulation of Settlement dated as of November 23, 2021 (the “Settlement”);

WHEREAS, on December 3, 2021, the Court entered an Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement, Provisionally Certifying the Settlement Class, and Appointing Class Counsel and Class Representatives for the Settlement Class (“Preliminary Approval Order”), which, inter alia: (i) preliminarily approved the Settlement; (ii) preliminarily determined that, for purposes of the Settlement only, the Action should proceed as a class action pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on behalf of the Settlement Class comprising:

All students enrolled in Columbia's Programs who were assessed Spring 2020 Fees, with the exception of: (i) any person who withdrew from Columbia on or before March 13, 2020; (ii) any person enrolled solely in a program for the Spring 2020 semester that was always and originally delivered as an online program; (iii) any person who properly executes and files a timely opt-out request to be excluded from the Settlement Class; and (iv) the legal representatives, successors or assigns of any such excluded person
where “Columbia's Programs” and “Spring 2020 Fees” have the meanings specified in Paragraph 1 of the Settlement; (iii) preliminarily appointed Student A, Chris Riotta, Lisa Guerra and Alexandra Taylor-Gutt as Settlement Class Representatives; (iv) preliminarily appointed Gainey McKenna & Egleston and Anastopoulo Law Firm, LLC as Class Counsel; (v) approved the forms and manner of notice of the Settlement to Potential Settlement Class Members; (vi) directed that 1 appropriate notice of the Settlement be given to the Potential Settlement Class; and (vii) set a hearing date to consider final approval of the Settlement;

WHEREAS, notice of the Settlement was provided to Potential Settlement Class Members in accordance with the Court's Preliminary Approval Order;

WHEREAS, on March 24, 2022, at 3:30 p.m., at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007, the Honorable Jesse M. Furman held a hearing to determine whether the Settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Settlement Class (“Fairness Hearing”);

WHEREAS, at the Fairness Hearing held on March 24, 2022, no opposition to the Settlement was expressed by any Party or any member of the Settlement Class; and

WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, having considered the papers filed and proceedings held in connection with the Settlement and all other files, records, and proceedings in the Action, and being otherwise fully advised, THE COURT HEREBY FINDS AND CONCLUDES that:

A. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action, and all matters relating to the Settlement, as well as personal jurisdiction over all the Parties and all the Settlement Class Members for purposes of the Settlement.

B. This Order incorporates the definitions in the Settlement and all terms used in the Order have the same meanings as set forth in the Settlement, unless otherwise defined herein.

C. The Short Form Notice and Long Form Notice (“the Notices”) provided to the Potential Settlement Class in accordance with the Preliminary Approval Order constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances of this Action and constituted due and sufficient notice of the proceedings and matters set forth therein, including of the Settlement, to all persons entitled 2 to notice. The Notices fully satisfied the requirements of due process, Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and all other applicable laws and rules.

D. The notice provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1715, have been satisfied.

E. For purposes of the Settlement only, the Action may proceed as a class action pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

F. Class Counsel and the Settlement Class Representatives have fairly and adequately represented the Settlement Class, both with respect to litigation of the Action and for purposes of entering into and implementing the Settlement. Class Counsel and the Settlement Class Representatives have satisfied the requirements of Rules 23(a)(4) and 23(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

G. Pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court grants final approval of the Settlement, as: (i) it is in all respects fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Settlement Class; (ii) it was the product of informed, arm's-length negotiations among competent, able counsel; (iii) it was based on a record that is sufficiently developed to have enabled the Settlement Class Representatives and Columbia to adequately evaluate their positions; (iv) the relief provided to the Settlement Class is adequate, taking into account the costs, risks, and delay of continued litigation and the effectiveness of the plan of allocation as outlined in the Settlement; (v) the Settlement treats Settlement Class Members equitably relative to one another; and (vi) the Settlement was positively received by the Settlement Class.

H. The persons who have timely and validly requested exclusion from the Settlement Class, if any, are identified in Exhibit 1 attached hereto (“Excluded Persons”).

I. The Settlement Class Representatives and the Settlement Class Members, and all 3 and each of them, are hereby bound by the terms of the Settlement.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Settlement Class. Accordingly, the Court authorizes and directs implementation of all terms and provisions of the Settlement.

2. All Parties to this Action, and all Settlement Class Members, are bound by the Settlement and this Final Judgment. Excluded Persons identified in Exhibit 1 are no longer parties to this Action and are not bound by the Settlement.

3. Final Judgment shall be, and hereby is, entered dismissing the Action with prejudice, and without taxation or costs in favor of or against any Party.

4. The Settlement Class Representatives, Class Counsel, and all other Settlement Class Members, and each of their respective present and former heirs, family members, guardians, executors, administrators, employees, agents, representatives, attorneys, outside counsel, predecessors, successors, assigns, and any person who has made payments to Columbia on their behalf (hereinafter “Releasing Settlement Class Parties”), are hereby conclusively deemed to have fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived and discharged Columbia and all of its present, future, and former parent, subsidiary, and affiliated corporations and entities, the predecessors and successors in interest of any of them, and each of the foregoing's respective present, future, and former officers, directors, trustees, academic affiliates, employees, faculty members, students, agents, representatives, attorneys, outside counsel, predecessors, successors, and assigns (hereinafter “Released Columbia Parties”), from any and all suits, claims, controversies, rights, agreements, promises, debts, liabilities, accounts, 4 reckonings, demands, damages, judgments, obligations, covenants, contracts, costs (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees and costs), losses, expenses, actions or causes of action of every nature, character, and description, in law or in equity, that any Releasing Party ever had, or has, or may have in the future, upon or by reason of any matter, cause, or thing whatever from the beginning of the world to the Effective Date of the Settlement, arising out of, concerning, or relating in any way to Columbia's transition to remote education with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic beginning in March 2020, or the implementation or administration of such remote education, including but not limited to all claims that were brought or could have been brought in the Action (hereinafter “Released Claims”).

5. The Releasing Settlement Class Parties are hereby barred and permanently enjoined from instituting, asserting or prosecuting any or all of the Released Claims against any of the Released Columbia Parties.

6. Columbia and all of its present and former parent, subsidiary, and affiliated corporations and entities, the predecessors and successors in interest of any of them, and each of the foregoing's respective present and former predecessors, successors, and assigns (hereinafter “Releasing Columbia Parties”), are hereby conclusively deemed to have fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged the Settlement Class Representatives, Class Counsel, and all other Settlement Class Members, and each of their respective present, future, and former heirs, family members, guardians, executors, administrators, employees, agents, representatives, attorneys, outside counsel, predecessors, successors, assigns, and any person who has made payments to Columbia on their behalf (hereinafter “Released Settlement Class Parties”), from all Released Claims.

7. The Releasing Columbia Parties are hereby barred and permanently enjoined from 5 instituting, asserting, or prosecuting any or all of the Released Claims against any of the Released Settlement Class Parties.

8. The manner of distribution of the Net Settlement Fund as described in the Settlement and in the Notices to Potential Settlement Class Members is hereby approved, subject to modification by further order of this Court, which may, at the discretion of the Court, be entered without further notice to the Settlement Class. Any order or proceedings relating to the manner of distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, so long as they are not materially inconsistent with this Final Judgment, shall not operate to terminate or cancel the Settlement or affect the finality of this Final Judgment approving the Settlement.

9. The Court hereby decrees that neither the Settlement nor this Final Judgment nor the fact of the Settlement is an admission or concession by Columbia of any fault, wrongdoing, or liability whatsoever. This Final Judgment is not a finding of the validity or invalidity of any of the claims asserted or defenses raised in the Action. Nothing relating to the Settlement shall be offered or received in evidence as an admission, concession, presumption, or inference against Columbia or the Released Columbia Parties in any proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to consummate or enforce the Settlement.

10. Class Counsel are awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $4,166,666.67, and reimbursement of litigation expenses in the amount of $1,987.08, such amounts to be paid from out of the Settlement Fund in accordance with the terms of the Settlement. In addition, $55,000 in Administrative Expenses are to be paid out of the Settlement Fund to Simpluris, Inc., to perform its responsibilities as the Settlement Administrator, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement.

11. Settlement Class Representatives are each awarded a case contribution award in the amount of $25,000.00, such amounts to be paid from out of the Settlement Fund in accordance 6 with the terms of the Settlement.

12. Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment in any way, the Court retains and reserves jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of this Settlement and any distributions from the Settlement Fund; (b) the Action, until each and every act agreed to be performed by the Parties shall have been performed pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Settlement and any further orders of the Court; and (c) the Parties, for the purpose of enforcing and administering the Settlement.

13. There is no just reason to delay the entry of this Final Judgment as a final judgment in this Action. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is expressly directed to immediately enter this Final Judgment in this Action and to close the case.

14. In the event that this Final Judgment does not become Final in accordance with Paragraph 1(k) of the Settlement, then this Final Judgment shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Settlement, and this Order shall be vacated. In such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection with the Settlement shall be null and void, except those necessary to effect termination of the Settlement. In such event, the Action shall return to its status immediately prior to execution of the Settlement.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. 7

Exhibit 1 - List of Excluded Persons

First Name

Last Name

Sergio

Acuna

Md Rasel

Ahmed

Aigerim

Akhmetova

Lucia

Alenar Iglesias

Waleed

Alqahtani

Solomon

Amadiume

Holly

Andrews

Henry

Anker

Jordan

Anstatt

Catalina

Antonio Granados

Daniel

Arias

Devin

Armstrong

Henry

Arroyo

Tarek

Aryani

Munir

Atalla

Roni

Aviv

Anastasia

Ayazi De Marchi

Harry

Bartle

Patrick

Bayly

Andrew

Bell

Cody

Beltis

Omer

Ben-David

Archibald

Benhamou

Anika

Benkov

Jacob

Berman

Caroline

Blair

Katherine

Blair

Christopher

Blanco

Minka

Bleakley

Paula

Bourgie

Eric

Brittain

Lindsey

Brittain

Claire

Brooks

Jonathan

Brown

Glenn

Brown

Ronald

Brown

Aliza

Brugger

Daniel

Byers

Rosana

Caban

Julian

Callaghan

Peter

Campbell

Ivana

Carman

Lunise

Cerin

Kaela

Chambers

Chiyang

Chang

Rali

Chaouni

Sushant

Chaudhary

Leila

Chediak

Susan

Chen

Szu-Wei

Chen

Wen Yuan

Chen

Ningxin

Chen

Po-Yu

Chen

Junyi

Chen

Jong Hwan

Choi

Tae Jung

Choi

Stephanie

Choriatis

Kevin

Claiborne

Spencer

Clawson

Patrick

Clement

Noga

Cohen

Avishag

Cohen Rodrigues

Joanna

Cortez

Lauren

Covey

Ryan

Craver

Marta

Cruanas Compes

Kristin

Curtis

Ian

Decker

Angeline

Dimambro

Major

Dorfman

Danielle

Douge

Ana

Dow Silva

Michael

Dukas

Benjamin

Eckersley

Jade

Edwards

Kathy

Esquenazi

Molly

Evans

Stephanie

Falkeis

Brittany

Fauconnet

Monica

Felix

Caitlin

Ferrell

Stephanie

Fine

Lauren

Fondren

8

Allison

Fontaine-Capel

Peter

Forbes

Jasmin

Freitas Tenucci

Paul

Gambourg

Esteban

Garcia Vernaza

Chenxi

Ge

Scott

Gerlomes

Lauren

Goetzman

Baris

Gokturk

Andrew

Golden

Mitchell

Gomes

Felipe

Gomez Mitsui

Justin

Goncalves

Fernando

Gonzalez Ortiz

Wesley

Goodrich

Danielle

Gottesman

Jorge

Granados Ross

Kenneth

Green

April

Griffin

Elizabeth

Grupp

Shanming

Guo

Joan

Hacker

Gina

Hackett

Eden

Hadad

Kevin

Haefelin

Emma

Hall-Martin

Camille

Hamadet

Chad

Hamilton

Joshua

Harris

Jennifer

Hassin

Mathilde

Hauducoeur

Juan David

Hernandez Diaz

Erin

Holland

Dong-Ren

Hong

Hsiao-Wen

Hsu

Tony

Huang

Jacob

Huebner

Megan

Huggins

Adam

Jackson

Neda

Jebelli

Priscilla

Jeong

Yi Fan

Jiang

Yue

Jiang

Shan

Jiang

Tianyi

Jiang

Jon

Jones

Robert

Jones

Omar

Kakar

Minkyu

Kang

Agnes

Karlsson

Joshua

Kellerman

Shannon

Kelley

Robert

Kerr

Katie

Kim

Jungyoon

Kim

Ji-Heuk

Kim

Max

Kimble

Kristin

Kohlmeyer

Clarece

Koury

Abhishek

Kumar

Melik

Kuru

Timothy

Kwasny

John

La Costa

Kinder

Labatt

Louis

Lagayette

Juan Paulo

Laserna

Rider

Laskin

Wai

Lau

Sarah

Lee

Yukyoung

Lee

Ryan

Levitt

Yiyi

Li

Lu

Li

Bicheng

Liang

Joseph

Liatela

Ke

Liu

Rodney

Llaverias

Jingwen

Long

Xiaomeng

Lu

Yuanjiong

Lu

Natalia

Luque

Paula

Lycan

Mackenzie

Lyle

Cara

Lynch

Mona

Maahn

Nina

Mahesh

Maria

Majluf Baeza

Keli

Maksud

Varun

Malik

Erica

Mao

Benjamin

Martin

Bruno

Mattos Rubeiz

Sean

Mcauliffe

Max

Mcgillivray

Hazel

Mckibbin

Raphaela

Melsohn

James

Mercer

Ethan

Mermelstein

Grace

Merriman

Kathryn

Miller

Aiman

Mimiko

Ida

Modaghegh Yazdi

Farah

Mohammad

Dennis

Morganti

Eric

Morton

Hallel

Mujingila Diakalenga

Selman

Nacar

Cameron

Nelson

Eric

Nelson

Jesahel

Newton-Bernal

9

Patrick

Nichols

Alvaro

Nunez Secchi

Olive

Nwosu

Nicholas

Nyhof

Keika

Okamoto

Olafur

Olason

Sonia

Oleniak

Adewale

Olukayode

Rebecca

Oneill

Gleb

Osatinski

Cecilia

Otero

Renee

Paiement

Diana

Palermo

Adelaide

Pallincourt

Sushama

Parmar

Moara

Passoni

Olivia

Peralta

Harrison

Perkins

Ana

Perromat

Adriana

Pettinga

Grace

Philips

William

Pinke

Tomas

Pinzon Lucena

Bradley

Pitts

Julia

Pontes

Yixuan

Qi

Erin

Ramirez

Antonio

Rattes De Farias

Ava

Ravich

Denisse

Reyes

Marion

Rich

Melanie

Rish

John

Rivas

Victoria

Rivera

James

Rodrigues

Xiaoyue

Ruan

Nader

Salem

Prashanth

Sampathkumaran

Chloe

Sarbib

Abigail

Schwarz

Yixuan

Shao

Rahul

Sharma

Vivienne

Shaw

Kio

Shijiki

Vishnu

Sinha

Daniel

Slottje

Warren

Smith

Tyler

St Pierre

Alexis

Stodghill

Andrea

Studinger

Dhruv

Sud

Stipan

Tadic

Margaret

Talbot-Minkin

Wan Xin

Tang

Kiyomi

Taylor

Dhane

Taylor

Erica

Tennyson

Natalie

Teter

Jaclyn

Todd

Donovan

Tolledo

Werner

Traut

Cooper

Troxell

Connie

Tsang

Khari

Turner

William

Turner

Barbara

Twist

Kari

Ulfsson

Gabriele

Urbonaite

Meera

Vaidya

Felix

Van Kann

Natchanon

Vana

Ricardo

Varona

Raelis

Vasquez

Brian

Velsor

Xiaolong

Wang

Jing

Wang

Rachel

Ward

Rachel

Webb

Saladin

White

Meredith

Wilson

Hongwei

Wu

Markus

Wulf

Yueyi

Xing

Hangcheng

Xu

Hyun

Yang

Anthony

Yang

Chien-Ni

Yang

Yachi

Yang

Zebang

Yang

Alexander

Yarber

Christina

Yoon

Ye

Yuan

Bofan

Zhang

Bohan

Zhang

Yihao

Zheng

10


Summaries of

In re Columbia Univ. Tuition Refund Action

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 29, 2022
1:20-cv-03208 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2022)
Case details for

In re Columbia Univ. Tuition Refund Action

Case Details

Full title:IN RE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TUITION REFUND ACTION

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 29, 2022

Citations

1:20-cv-03208 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2022)