From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Coleman

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 14, 2022
250 N.J. 120 (N.J. 2022)

Opinion

D-155 September Term 2020 086090

03-14-2022

In the MATTER OF Kendal COLEMAN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 005892000)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 20-317, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent), that Kendal Coleman of Clifton, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2000, should be censured for violating RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping), RPC 1.5(a) (unreasonable fee), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Kendal Coleman is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Coleman

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 14, 2022
250 N.J. 120 (N.J. 2022)
Case details for

In re Coleman

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Kendal COLEMAN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Mar 14, 2022

Citations

250 N.J. 120 (N.J. 2022)
270 A.3d 360

Citing Cases

In re Weiner

Respondent's miscalculation of his attorney fees constituted a per se violation RPC 1.5(a), which prohibits…

In re Coleman

On March 14, 2022, respondent again was censured, in a second default matter, for violating RPC 1.5(a)…