From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Coleman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 10, 2019
No. 19-1775 (4th Cir. Dec. 10, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-1775

12-10-2019

In re: PAUL BERNARD COLEMAN, Petitioner.

Paul Bernard Coleman, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:09-cr-00207-MHL-1) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Bernard Coleman, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul Bernard Coleman petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to clarify his sentence. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court has denied Coleman's motion to clarify. United States v. Coleman, No. 3:09-cr-00207-MHL-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 7, 2019). Accordingly, because the district court has recently acted on Coleman's motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Coleman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 10, 2019
No. 19-1775 (4th Cir. Dec. 10, 2019)
Case details for

In re Coleman

Case Details

Full title:In re: PAUL BERNARD COLEMAN, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 10, 2019

Citations

No. 19-1775 (4th Cir. Dec. 10, 2019)