From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Coleman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 23, 2018
No. 18-1620 (4th Cir. Jul. 23, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-1620

07-23-2018

In re: PAUL BERNARD COLEMAN, Petitioner.

Paul Bernard Coleman, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:18-hc-02078-FL) Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Bernard Coleman, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul Bernard Coleman petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Coleman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 23, 2018
No. 18-1620 (4th Cir. Jul. 23, 2018)
Case details for

In re Coleman

Case Details

Full title:In re: PAUL BERNARD COLEMAN, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 23, 2018

Citations

No. 18-1620 (4th Cir. Jul. 23, 2018)