From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Coleman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 1, 2005
886 A.2d 180 (N.J. 2005)

Opinion

December 1, 2005


ORDER

The Supreme Court having ordered on November 4, 2005, that THOMAS J. COLEMAN, III, of MOORESTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year, effective December 1, 2005, as a matter of reciprocal discipline based on respondent's suspension from the practice of law in Pennsylvania for practicing law while on inactive status in that State;

And the Court having granted respondent's motions for reconsideration, a stay of the Order of suspension, and oral argument, and having ordered THOMAS J. COLEMAN, III, to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And the Court having heard the arguments of counsel and having reconsidered the disposition of this matter of reciprocal discipline;

And the Court having determined that the misconduct established warrants substantially different discipline from that imposed in Pennsylvania and that a term of suspension is not required as discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Order of the Court filed on November 4, 2005, that suspends respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year is hereby vacated; and it is further

ORDERED that THOMAS J. COLEMAN, III, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Coleman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 1, 2005
886 A.2d 180 (N.J. 2005)
Case details for

In re Coleman

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS J. COLEMAN, III, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 1, 2005

Citations

886 A.2d 180 (N.J. 2005)
886 A.2d 180

Citing Cases

In re Wright

Reprimands also have been imposed in numerous motions for reciprocal discipline - even after the attorney…

In re Taylor

ion of the RPCs governing the obligation to be truthful, such as RPC 3.3(a)(5) and RPC 8.4(c), a reprimand…