From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2011
84 A.D.3d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2011-03872.

May 3, 2011.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondent, Robert A. Ross, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, from presiding over a hearing in an action entitled Cohen v Cohen, pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under index No. 200455/07.

Eyal Cohen, Port Washington, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Mary Y. J. Kim of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Covello, J.P., Chambers, Lott and Miller, JJ.


Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352).

The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

In re Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2011
84 A.D.3d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Cohen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EYAL COHEN, Petitioner, v. ROBERT A. Ross, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 2011

Citations

84 A.D.3d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 3844
922 N.Y.S.2d 783

Citing Cases

Cohen v. Cohen

HISTORYBy decision and judgment of the Appellate Division, Second Department dated May 3, 2011 ( Matter of…

Cohen v. Cohen

HISTORY By decision and judgment of the Appellate Division, Second Department dated May 3, 2011 ( Matter of…