From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cloud

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Feb 23, 2022
No. S271655 (Cal. Feb. 23, 2022)

Opinion

S271655

02-23-2022

CLOUD (JOEL JAMES) ON H.C.


The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive].) Individual claims are denied, as applicable. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available documentary evidence]; In re Dixon(1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that could have been, but were not, raised on appeal].)


Summaries of

In re Cloud

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Feb 23, 2022
No. S271655 (Cal. Feb. 23, 2022)
Case details for

In re Cloud

Case Details

Full title:CLOUD (JOEL JAMES) ON H.C.

Court:California Supreme Court(Minute Order)

Date published: Feb 23, 2022

Citations

No. S271655 (Cal. Feb. 23, 2022)