From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Apr 14, 2005
No. 01-05-00004-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2005)

Opinion

No. 01-05-00003-CV

Opinion issued April 14, 2005.

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Panel consists of Justices TAFT, KEYES, and HANKS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator, Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus complaining that Judge Sullivan erred by assessing $2500 in fines and eight hours of ethics continuing legal education in sanctions resulting from Clark's discovery abuse and professional misconduct.

The Honorable Kent Sullivan, judge of the 80th District Court of Harris County, Texas. The underlying lawsuit is John Clark, III, Individually and d/b/a Celtic Contractors v. Tom Bres and Jan Bres, a/k/a Jan Holinzinger, No. 2002-32596.

Holding that Clark has an adequate remedy by appeal, we deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Velez v. DeLara, 905 S.W.2d 23, 26 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1953, no writ).


Summaries of

In re Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Apr 14, 2005
No. 01-05-00004-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2005)
Case details for

In re Clark

Case Details

Full title:IN RE BETTY STOVALL (KIT) CLARK, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Apr 14, 2005

Citations

No. 01-05-00004-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2005)