From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Clark

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Apr 4, 2014
137 So. 3d 11 (La. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2014–B–0518.

2014-04-4

In re Sonceree Smith CLARK.


In re: Disciplinary Counsel; Clark, Sonceree Smith;—Other(s); Applying For Joint Motion for Consent Discipline.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS


PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with a client, and failed to promptly refund an unearned fee. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent refunded the fee and thereafter she and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Sonceree Smith Clark, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19275, be and she hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.


Summaries of

In re Clark

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Apr 4, 2014
137 So. 3d 11 (La. 2014)
Case details for

In re Clark

Case Details

Full title:In re Sonceree Smith CLARK.

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Apr 4, 2014

Citations

137 So. 3d 11 (La. 2014)