From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Clark

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Apr 17, 2019
S254276 (Cal. Apr. 17, 2019)

Opinion

S254276

04-17-2019

CLARK ON DISCIPLINE


Petition for review denied; recommended discipline imposed

The petition for review is denied.

The court orders that DIDDO RUTH CLARK (Respondent), State Bar Number 79876, is suspended from the practice of law in California for one year, execution of that period of suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for one year subject to the following conditions:

1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first 60 days of probation;

2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the Review Department of the State Bar Court in its Opinion filed on January 7, 2019; and

3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be terminated.

Respondent must provide to the State Bar's Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Review Department in its Opinion filed on January 7, 2019. Failure to do so may result in suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)

Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7 and as a money judgment.


Summaries of

In re Clark

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Apr 17, 2019
S254276 (Cal. Apr. 17, 2019)
Case details for

In re Clark

Case Details

Full title:CLARK ON DISCIPLINE

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Apr 17, 2019

Citations

S254276 (Cal. Apr. 17, 2019)