From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Claim of Roettinger

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1963
196 N.E.2d 268 (N.Y. 1963)

Opinion

Argued November 20, 1963

Decided December 30, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Gerard L. Peace and Urban S. Mulvehill for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Harry Rackow, Paxton Blair and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

No appearance for claimant-respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence that the award is based on any occupational disease.


Summaries of

In re Claim of Roettinger

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1963
196 N.E.2d 268 (N.Y. 1963)
Case details for

In re Claim of Roettinger

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of HENRY ROETTINGER, Respondent, v. GREAT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 30, 1963

Citations

196 N.E.2d 268 (N.Y. 1963)
196 N.E.2d 268
246 N.Y.S.2d 633

Citing Cases

Claim of Snir v. J. W. Mays, Inc.

( Matter of Moore v. Ford Motor Co., 9 A.D.2d 165, 167.) The case seems to us indistinguishable from such…

Matter of Paider v. Park East Movers

The Appellate Division, two Justices dissenting ( 26 A.D.2d 752), affirmed a finding by the Workmen's…