The therapists and caseworker believed E.O. was continuing to drink, and E.O.'s therapist testified she contacted law enforcement in March of 2018 after E.O. threatened to kill herself during a phone conversation. In re F.M., No. 14-18-00384-CV, 2018 WL 4925127, at *7 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 11, 2018, no pet. h.) (noting evidence of a parent's unstable lifestyle, including alcohol use, supports best interest finding); In re C.K., No. 04-17-00034-CV, 2017 WL 2791315, at *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 28, 2017, pet. denied) (citing Department's concerns about mother's unaddressed alcohol abuse as evidence to support best interest finding). E.O. testified the therapist misunderstood the statements made during the phone conversation.

The permanency report admitted in evidence likewise showed Ashley D. had engaged in services. See In re C.K., No. 04-17-00034-CV, 2017 WL 2791315, at *3 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 28, 2017, no pet. h.) (holding that mother asking questions and beginning to engage in services was evidence to support finding that mother understood the requirements of the service plan). In looking at all the evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court's finding, we conclude a reasonable trier of fact could have formed a firm belief or conviction that Ashley D.'s rights should be terminated under section 161.001(b)(1)(O).