In re City of Phoenix

Full title: In the Matter of the Annexation to the CITY OF PHOENIX of Certain…

Court: Supreme Court of Arizona

Date published: May 9, 1938

79 P.2d 360 (Ariz. 1938)

79 P.2d 360

Opinion

Civil No. 3947.

Filed May 9, 1938.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. E.R. Thurman, Judge. Judgment affirmed.

Mr. I.A. Jennings, City Attorney, Mr. Hess Seaman and Mr. Richard F. Harless, his Assistants; Messrs. Snell, Strouss Salmon, Mr. J. Early Craig, Messrs. Kibbey, Bennett, Gust, Smith Rosenfeld, Mr. T.G. McKesson, Mr. Frank J. Duffy, Mr. T.A. Carson, Mr. Emmett R. Feighner and Mr. Evan S. Stallcup, for Appellant.

Messrs. Palmer Cornelius and Messrs. Cunningham Carson, for Appellees.

Mr. E.C. Locklear, City Attorney, Prescott; Mr. G.H. Drumm, City Attorney, Winslow; Mr. William H. Westover, City Attorney, Yuma; Mr. Stephen D. Monahan, City Attorney, Nogales; Mr. Cullen A. Little, City Attorney, Globe; Mr. George F. Senner, City Attorney, Miami; Mr. James A. Walsh, City Attorney, Mesa; Mr. Martin Gentry, City Attorney, Willcox; Mr. A. Van Wagenen, Jr., City Attorney, Casa Grande; Mr. Edward R. Byers, Town Attorney, Williams; Mr. I.F. Wolpe, Jr., Town Attorney, Wickenburg; Mr. James T. Gentry, City Attorney, Bisbee; Mr. Orinn C. Compton, City Attorney, Flagstaff; Mr. B.G. Thompson, City Attorney, Tucson, and Mr. Arthur Henderson, of Counsel, for City of Tucson, Amici Curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The question for review in this case is the same as that in case No. 3945, Udall v. Severn, ante, p. 65, 79 P.2d 347, and is controlled by the decision just handed down in that case. Under the stipulation of counsel it was submitted upon the same briefs and statement of facts.

The same order will be made as in case No. 3945.

McALISTER, C.J., and ROSS and LOCKWOOD, JJ., concur.