From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re City of Houston

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Aug 27, 2019
NO. 14-19-00142-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 14-19-00142-CV

08-27-2019

IN RE CITY OF HOUSTON, ET AL., Relators


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS
333rd District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2015-35252 & 2015-35252A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 20, 2019, relators the City of Houston, et al., filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of a severance order, signed October 12, 2018, and a final judgment, signed October 12, 2018 ("the Original Proceeding"). On March 26, 2019, the court consolidated the Original Proceeding with a related appeal: No. 14-18-00896-CV, City of Houston et al. v. Houston Municipal Employees Pension System ("the Appeal").

On August 16, 2019, the parties filed a "Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Abate Appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion to dismiss the mandamus petition is granted. The Original Proceeding is dismissed. The Appeal will be abated by separate order.

Although the Appeal and the Original Proceeding were consolidated, both cause numbers remain open. The motion bears the cause number of the Appeal but not the cause number of the Original Proceeding. The substance of the motion makes clear the parties seek relief in the Original Proceeding. Accordingly, we treat the motion as having been filed in the Original Proceeding.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.


Summaries of

In re City of Houston

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Aug 27, 2019
NO. 14-19-00142-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2019)
Case details for

In re City of Houston

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CITY OF HOUSTON, ET AL., Relators

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 27, 2019

Citations

NO. 14-19-00142-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2019)

Citing Cases

City of Houston v. Hous. Mun. Emp. Pension Sys.

At the parties’ request, we dismissed a separate petition for writ of mandamus filed in this court before the…