From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cianfarra v. Dept. of Transportation

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1982
295 S.E.2d 457 (N.C. 1982)

Summary

vacating and remanding per curiam 56 N.C. App. 380, 289 S.E.2d 100, in effect adopting the reasoning of the dissent therein

Summary of this case from In re Poteat v. Employment Security Comm

Opinion

No. 177A82

Filed 5 October 1982

APPEAL by defendants pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (2) from a decision of the Court of Appeals affirming judgment of Rouse, J., at the April, 1982, session of NEW HANOVER Superior Court. The decision of the Court of Appeals by Judge Arnold with Judge Whichard concurring and Judge Clark dissenting was reported in 56 N.C. App. 380, 289 S.E.2d 100 (1982).

Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General, by Blackwell M. Brogden, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellant Department of Transportation.

T. S. Whitaker, Acting Chief Counsel, Thelma M. Hill and V. Henry Gransee, Jr., Staff Attorneys, for appellant Employment Security Commission of North Carolina

Nelson, Smith Hall, by Mary E. Lee and Alexander M. Hall, for appellee.


The facts of this case are adequately stated in the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the rationale and supporting authorities set forth in Judge Clark's dissent constitute an accurate statement of the law and a correct application of that law to the facts. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated and this cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals with direction that it remand to the Superior Court of New Hanover County with an order vacating the judgment of Rouse, J., entered in Superior Court of New Hanover County on 7 April 1981 and ordering that the cause be remanded to the Employment Security Commission of North Carolina for findings as to whether claimant was discharged for misconduct.

Vacated and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

In re Cianfarra v. Dept. of Transportation

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1982
295 S.E.2d 457 (N.C. 1982)

vacating and remanding per curiam 56 N.C. App. 380, 289 S.E.2d 100, in effect adopting the reasoning of the dissent therein

Summary of this case from In re Poteat v. Employment Security Comm
Case details for

In re Cianfarra v. Dept. of Transportation

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF: CHARLES T. CIANFARRA, CLAIMANT v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1982

Citations

295 S.E.2d 457 (N.C. 1982)
295 S.E.2d 457

Citing Cases

In re Poteat v. Employment Security Comm

The Commission thus is entitled to a remand for findings on these issues. In re Cumfarra v. Dept. of…

Eason v. Gould, Inc.

In re Scaringelli, In re Watson, supra. Appellees cite In re Cianfarra, 56 N.C. App. 380, 289 S.E.2d 100…