From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Chuan Chen

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 25, 2022
No. 05-22-00140-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 25, 2022)

Opinion

05-22-00140-CV

02-25-2022

IN RE CHUAN CHEN AND M. TAYARI GARRETT, Relators


Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-17249

Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE.

Before the Court are relators' February 22, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Based on our review of the petition and record, we conclude relators have failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

We deny relators' motion for emergency stay as moot.


Summaries of

In re Chuan Chen

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 25, 2022
No. 05-22-00140-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 25, 2022)
Case details for

In re Chuan Chen

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CHUAN CHEN AND M. TAYARI GARRETT, Relators

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Feb 25, 2022

Citations

No. 05-22-00140-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 25, 2022)