From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Chilcote

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 21, 2022
22-cv-04706-PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-04706-PJH

10-21-2022

IN RE RONALD CHILCOTE,


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This case was opened when plaintiff, an Oregon state prisoner proceeding pro se, wrote a letter to the court. In an effort to protect his rights, it was filed as a new case. Plaintiff was informed that he had not filed a complaint and was given twenty-eight days to do so. He also was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”); again, he was allowed twenty-eight days to either pay the fee or file the application. A copy of the court's form for applications to proceed IFP was provided with the notice. Twenty-eight days has passed and plaintiff has not submitted any filing or otherwise communicated with the court. This case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice. No fee is due.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Chilcote

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 21, 2022
22-cv-04706-PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2022)
Case details for

In re Chilcote

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RONALD CHILCOTE,

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 21, 2022

Citations

22-cv-04706-PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2022)