From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Chaya K.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 19, 2017
149 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

04-19-2017

In the Matter of CHAYA K. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent; Allen K. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Rivah K. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent; Allen K. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) In the Matter of Baby Girl D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent; Allen K. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 3).

Rhea G. Friedman, New York, NY, for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Scott Shorr and Eric Lee of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Ralph R. Carrieri, Mineola, NY, attorney for the children.


Rhea G. Friedman, New York, NY, for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Scott Shorr and Eric Lee of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Ralph R. Carrieri, Mineola, NY, attorney for the children.

Appeal by the father from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ilana Gruebel, J.), dated December 31, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a hearing, granted the petitioner's application pursuant to Family Court Act § 1027 to place the child Baby Girl D. in the custody of the petitioner pending the outcome of the neglect proceedings.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

After a hearing, the Family Court properly granted the petitioner's application pursuant to Family Court Act § 1027 to temporarily remove the child Baby Girl D. from the parents' care and place her in the custody of the petitioner pending the outcome of the neglect proceedings. There was a sound and substantial basis in the record for the court's determination that removal was necessary to avoid imminent risk to the child's life or health, and that the risk could not be mitigated by reasonable efforts short of removal (see Family Ct. Act § 1027 ; Nicholson v. Scoppetta, 3 N.Y.3d 357, 378, 787 N.Y.S.2d 196, 820 N.E.2d 840 ).

CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Chaya K.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 19, 2017
149 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re Chaya K.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHAYA K. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 19, 2017

Citations

149 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
50 N.Y.S.3d 304

Citing Cases

In re Baby J.

ible" danger to the child ( Nicholson v. Scoppetta , 3 N.Y.3d at 369, 787 N.Y.S.2d 196, 820 N.E.2d 840 ).…