From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Chamila

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 2008
51 A.D.3d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 2007-06472, 2007-06667 (Docket No. D-03230-06).

May 20, 2008.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Chamila J. appeals (1) from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated June 8, 2007, which, after a hearing, granted that branch of the petition which was to extend her placement with the Dutchess County Department of Social Services for a period of up to 12 months, and (2), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the same court, also dated June 8, 2007, as extended her placement with the Dutchess County Department of Social Services for a period of 12 months.

John A. Pappalardo, White Plains, N.Y., attorney for the appellant.

Ronald L. Wozniak, County Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Victor A. Civitillo of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Santucci, J.P., Covello, Belen and Chambers, JJ.


Ordered that the appeal from the first order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the second order; and it is further,

Ordered that the second order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in extending her placement for a period of 12 months ( see Family Ct Act § 355.3; Matter of Yves J.-J., 27 AD3d 465; Matter of Ashanti W., 242 AD2d 539). The court's finding that continued placement would protect the community and serve the appellant's best interests is supported by a preponderance of the evidence ( see Matter of Ashanti W., 242 AD2d at 539; Matter of Luis M., 230 AD2d 743; Matter of Percy H., 159 AD2d 623).

The appellant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit.


Summaries of

In re Chamila

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 2008
51 A.D.3d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Chamila

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHAMILA J., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 2008

Citations

51 A.D.3d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4700
856 N.Y.S.2d 880

Citing Cases

In re Ryan

The written order was erroneously submitted to and approved by another judge (Powers, J.), and subsequently…