From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cellino

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 16, 2014
217 N.J. 361 (N.J. 2014)

Opinion

2014-05-16

In the Matter of Peter R. CELLINO, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 044312004).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13–259, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f) (default by respondent), that PETER R. CELLINO of FARMINGTON, CONNECTICUT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2005, should be censured for violating RPC 5.5(a)(1) (unauthorized practice of law), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PETER R. CELLINO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Cellino

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 16, 2014
217 N.J. 361 (N.J. 2014)
Case details for

In re Cellino

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Peter R. CELLINO, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: May 16, 2014

Citations

217 N.J. 361 (N.J. 2014)
89 A.3d 582

Citing Cases

In re Nadel

(February 26, 2010) (admonition for attorney who was not admitted in Nevada but represented a client who was…

In re Gordon

ough not admitted in New York, attorney represented a client there; attorney had represented several other…