In re Ceana R.

6 Citing cases

  1. In re Phx. M.

    221 Conn. App. 789 (Conn. App. Ct. 2023)   Cited 1 times

    (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Ceana R. , 177 Conn. App. 758, 775, 172 A.3d 870, cert. denied, 327 Conn. 991, 175 A.3d 1244 (2017). "It is within the trial court's discretion to determine whether a factual basis exists for appointing new counsel ....

  2. Tara S. v. Charles J.

    178 Conn. App. 547 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017)

    See, e.g., U.S. Const., amend. VI ("[i]n all criminal proceedings ..."); Conn. Const., art. 1, § 8 (same); U.S. Const., amend. V ("[n]o person shall be ... subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb ..."); cf. In re Ceana R. , 177 Conn. App. 758, 772, 172 A.3d 870 (2017) (noting that constitutional protections of sixth amendment to United States constitution and article first, § 8, of state constitution do not extend to parents in neglect proceeding, which is civil proceeding). See U.S. Const., amend. VI ; see also Conn. Const., art. 1, § 8.

  3. In re Ceana R.

    327 Conn. 991 (Conn. 2017)   Cited 3 times

    Daniel M. Salton, assistant attorney general, in opposition.The respondent father's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 177 Conn. App. 758, 172 A.3d 870 (2017), is denied. D'AURIA and KAHN, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

  4. Clue v. Comm'r of Corr.

    223 Conn. App. 803 (Conn. App. Ct. 2024)   Cited 1 times

    Indeed, this court previously has recognized that the sixth amendment protections that extend to the statutory right to habeas counsel do not similarly extend to a parent’s right to counsel in neglect or termination of parental rights proceedings. See In re Ceana R., 177 Conn. App. 758, 772, 172 A.3d 870, cert. denied, 327 Conn. 991, 175 A.3d 1244 (2017); In re Isaiah J., 140 Conn. App. 626, 640, 59 A.3d 892, cert. denied, 308 Conn. 926, 64 A.3d 333, cert. denied sub nom. Megan J. v. Katz, 571 U.S. 924, 134 S. Ct. 317, 187 L. Ed. 2d 224 (2013). Moreover, our Supreme Court has explained that different legal standards govern claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in termination of parental rights cases and in criminal habeas corpus cases because "the finality considerations in a collateral challenge to a termination of parental rights are drastically different from those presented by a writ of habeas corpus attacking a criminal conviction with respect to the fundamental fairness concerns that drive the availability of the writ as a common-law remedy. …

  5. McCarthy v. Comm'r of Corr.

    192 Conn. App. 797 (Conn. App. Ct. 2019)   Cited 8 times
    Determining that petitioner's due process claim that his guilty plea was involuntary because of his misunderstanding of state's evidence, while related to petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, is "a separate, freestanding due process claim subject to procedural default"

    (Citation omitted; emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Ceana R. , 177 Conn. App. 758, 769, 172 A.3d 870, cert. denied, 327 Conn. 991, 175 A.3d 1244 (2017).

  6. State v. Kukucka

    181 Conn. App. 329 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018)   Cited 5 times

    Id., at 142–43, 866 A.2d 649. As a result, this court remanded the case for further proceedings to determine the nature of the three grievances. Id., at 143, 866 A.2d 649 ; see also In re Ceana R., 177 Conn. App. 758, 771–72, 172 A.3d 870 (2017), cert. denied, 327 Conn. 991, 175 A.3d 1244 (2018).In Morgan , the petitioner specifically asserted a conflict of interest before the habeas court and claimed that he disagreed with his habeas counsel's trial strategy.