The evidence that J.S assaulted his mother is evidence of an overt act that is probative of a finding that serious harm to others is probable if he is not treated. See K.E.W. I, 315 S.W.3d at 26; see also In re J.L., No. 14-05-00360-CV, 2006 WL 56821, at *5 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 12, 2006, no pet.) (evidence legally sufficient to show likelihood of serious harm to others where proposed patient's overt acts included: behavior since stopping medication was becoming increasingly aggressive; shortly before emergency detention patient had to be removed from store for aggression for fear she would harm herself or others; she became so aggressive in treatment that she had to be restrained to protect herself and others, and her record indicated she had been aggressive and violent during bouts of mania, including assaulting police officer); In re C.C.S., 113 S.W.3d 459, 461 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2003, no pet.) (evidence legally sufficient to show likelihood of serious harm to others where proposed patient said she had to prepare her family for journey to Heaven, sold all children's clothes and family's possessions, kept children out of school for year, and denied them medical care); In re H.W., 85 S.W.3d 348, 353-54 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2002, no pet.) (evidence legally sufficient where proposed patient had started fire in his family's home, although patient claimed it was an accident, and because he had started other fires in the past); D.K. v. State, No. 05-01-00376-CV, 2001 WL 1151220, at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 1, 2001, no pet.) (evidence legally sufficient where proposed patient had been "assaultive" towards hospital staff, which doctor defined as "usually it's physical confrontation so there's some type of grasping, touching, biting, kicking"). J.S. argues that there is no evidence that he is likely to cause "serious" harm to others.

s would kill her and somatic delusions of impending death held legally insufficient to support commitment); K.T. v. State, 68 S.W.3d 887, 893 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (patient's delusions she was pregnant and had vaginal sutures held legally insufficient to support commitment); D.J. v. State, 59 S.W.3d 352, 357 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2001, no pet.) (patient's delusions she had undergone dehumanizing surgery by satellite and used as a guinea pig by unknown technological forces held legally insufficient to support commitment); Broussard v. State, 827 S.W.2d 619, 620-21 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1992, no writ) (patient's delusions she was an FBI agent and an attorney, that the trial judge and one of her doctors were mass murderers she had previously convicted and put in jail, that other MHMR workers were felons she had sent to jail, that one of her doctors was a woman dressed as a man, and that her medicine was poisonous held legally insufficient to support commitment). Cf. In re C.C.S., 113 S.W.3d 459, 461-62 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2003, no pet.) (patient's delusions she was female counterpart of Jesus Christ and she and her children would soon be traveling to kingdom of God, together with her selling all the family's possessions including her children's coats, removing her children from school, and failing to provide necessary medical care to children held sufficient evidence to support commitment); State ex rel. L.C.F., 96 S.W.3d 651, 657-58 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2003, no pet.) (patient's entering neighbor's house without permission under belief that rap singer Eminem was after him and was going to kill him, and after leaving neighbor's house running down the street and hiding under a parked car, together with presence of rotting food in kitchen held sufficient evidence to support commitment); Goldwait v. State, 961 S.W.2d 432 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist] 1997, no writ) (patient's belief he and his brothers had genetically superior blood, his desire to bleed himself and his brothers to provide their blood for hospitals, his beli