From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cayman

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 9, 2016
2016-1617 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1617

12-09-2016

IN RE: CALIBURGER CAYMAN, Appellant

BRADLEY J. WALZ, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, CHRISTINA HIEBER, THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 85/810,919.

JUDGMENT

BRADLEY J. WALZ, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, CHRISTINA HIEBER, THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 9, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Cayman

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 9, 2016
2016-1617 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2016)
Case details for

In re Cayman

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: CALIBURGER CAYMAN, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 9, 2016

Citations

2016-1617 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2016)