From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cataline

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 2, 2014
219 N.J. 429 (N.J. 2014)

Opinion

2014-10-2

In the Matter of Anne P. CATALINE, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 001691994).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13–412, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f) (default by respondent), that ANNE P. CATALINE of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANNE P. CATALINE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Cataline

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 2, 2014
219 N.J. 429 (N.J. 2014)
Case details for

In re Cataline

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Anne P. CATALINE, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Oct 2, 2014

Citations

219 N.J. 429 (N.J. 2014)
219 N.J. 429

Citing Cases

In re Vena

See, e.g., In re Cataline, 219 N.J. 429 (2014) (attorney guilty of gross neglect, lack of diligence, failure…

In re Vaccaro

Generally, in default matters, a reprimand is imposed for lack of diligence, failure to communicate with the…