From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Casiano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 14, 1996
233 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 14, 1996.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Before: Cardona, P.J., White, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ.


Petitioner was an inmate at Sing Sing Correctional Facility in Westchester County when he was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting solicitation of goods and smuggling or the attempted smuggling of items into the facility. Petitioner challenges this determination on the ground that it is not based upon substantial evidence.

Adduced in evidence against petitioner was the misbehavior report, written by an investigator from the Inspector General's Narcotics Unit who had a telephone conversation with petitioner that was arranged by an informant. The misbehavior report states that petitioner solicited the investigator to send $500 to a certain address for the purchase of heroin that would be smuggled into the correctional facility by petitioner's wife who would give some of the heroin to the investigator. Also in evidence at the disciplinary hearing was the testimony of the investigator in which he described his telephone conversation with petitioner. He further testified that the facility's records showed that numerous disbursements of cash had been made by various inmates to petitioner's wife.

We find that the determination of petitioner's guilt was supported by substantial evidence ( see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966). To the extent that petitioner's testimony and that of his inmate witness was in conflict with that of the investigator and the misbehavior report, such conflict presented an issue of credibility which was appropriately determined by the Hearing Officer ( see, supra, at 966). We have examined the remaining contentions made on petitioner's behalf and find them to be either without merit or unpreserved for our review.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Casiano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 14, 1996
233 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Casiano

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAYMOND CASIANO, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
649 N.Y.S.2d 839

Citing Cases

Matter of Casiano v. Coughlin

Decided February 11, 1997 Appeal from (3d Dept: 233 A.D.2d 642) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…

Lopez v. Goord

She was told to call the telephone number of the mother of an inmate housed in petitioner's dormitory who was…