From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Caruso

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 6, 2021
248 N.J. 426 (N.J. 2021)

Opinion

D-107 Sept. Term 2020 085708

10-06-2021

In the MATTER OF Dominic V. CARUSO, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 001061979)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 20-191, recommending that Dominic V. Caruso of Clifton, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, be disbarred for violating RPC 1.15(a) and the principles of In re Wilson, 81 N.J. 451, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979) and In re Hollendonner, 102 N.J. 21, 504 A.2d 1174 (1985) (knowing misappropriation of client and escrow funds), RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on a lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer - by misapplication of entrusted property, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:21-15 ), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation);

And Dominic V. Caruso having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And the Court having considered the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel and having concluded from its review of the record that respondent had negligently, and not knowingly, misappropriated funds, in violation of RPC 1.15(a), and that the additional charges of unethical conduct ( RPC 8.4(b) and RPC (c)) therefore should be dismissed;

And the Court having determined that a six-month suspension from practice is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Dominic V. Caruso is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, effective November 5, 2021, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Caruso

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 6, 2021
248 N.J. 426 (N.J. 2021)
Case details for

In re Caruso

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Dominic V. CARUSO, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Oct 6, 2021

Citations

248 N.J. 426 (N.J. 2021)
248 N.J. 426

Citing Cases

In re Pepsny

The Court, however, disagreed by way of Order, finding that Caruso had committed only negligent…

In re Cicala

The Court, however, disagreed by way of Order, finding that Caruso had committed 58 only negligent…