From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Carmen

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 27, 2010
201 N.J. 141 (N.J. 2010)

Opinion

January 27, 2010.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-121, concluding that JOSEPH A. CARMEN of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3(lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH A. CARMEN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Carmen

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 27, 2010
201 N.J. 141 (N.J. 2010)
Case details for

In re Carmen

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH A. CARMEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 27, 2010

Citations

201 N.J. 141 (N.J. 2010)
987 A.2d 1213

Citing Cases

In re Zonies

See, e.g., In re Marcus, 208 N.J. 178 (2011) (in addition to engaging in a lack of diligence, attorney failed…

In re Moses

See, e.g., In re Carmen, 201 N.J. 141 (2010) (reprimand for attorney who, for a period of two years, failed…