From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Carlos M.

Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Three.
Nov 19, 2003
B166263 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2003)

Opinion

B166263.

11-19-2003

In re CARLOS M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARLOS M., Defendant and Appellant.

Dee A. Hayashi, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Minor and appellant Carlos M. appeals the judgment (order declaring minor a ward of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602) based upon the finding he committed petty theft, a misdemeanor. ( Pen. Code, § 666.)

We appointed counsel to represent Carlos M. on this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised and which requested this court to conduct an independent review of the record. By notice filed September 23, 2003, the clerk of this court advised Carlos M. to submit any contention, ground of appeal or argument he wished this court to consider within 30 days. No response has been received to date.

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied Carlos M.s counsel has complied fully with counsels responsibilities. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment (order declaring minor a ward of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602) is affirmed.

We concur: CROSKEY, J., and KITCHING, J.


Summaries of

In re Carlos M.

Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Three.
Nov 19, 2003
B166263 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2003)
Case details for

In re Carlos M.

Case Details

Full title:In re CARLOS M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Three.

Date published: Nov 19, 2003

Citations

B166263 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2003)