From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Carlos Abreu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 23, 2011
85 A.D.3d 1451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 509436.

June 23, 2011.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Gilpatric, J.), entered March 4, 2010 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.

Carlos Abreu, Romulus, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Rose, Malone Jr., Stein and Garry, JJ.


In September 2009, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to require the proper functioning of the inmate grievance procedure at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Washington County where he was incarcerated. Respondent moved to dismiss the petition on a number of grounds. Supreme Court granted the motion and dismissed the petition. This appeal ensued.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner was transferred to a different correctional facility in March 2010. Notably, the relief requested in the petition relates solely to the inmate grievance procedure in effect at Great Meadow Correctional Facility and to the officials who administer it. Given petitioner's transfer, he is no longer aggrieved and, thus, the appeal is now moot and must be dismissed ( see Matter of Abreu v Bellamy, 81 AD3d 1004).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Carlos Abreu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 23, 2011
85 A.D.3d 1451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Carlos Abreu

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARLOS ABREU, Appellant, v. BRANDI WHITE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 23, 2011

Citations

85 A.D.3d 1451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5374
925 N.Y.S.2d 906

Citing Cases

Dawes v. Annucci

Initially, to the extent that petitioner challenges the denial of his two grievances, we note that petitioner…

Dawes v. Annucci

Initially, to the extent that petitioner challenges the denial of his two grievances, we note that petitioner…