In re Care & Treatment of Whitlock

Full title: In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of O'Bryan B. Whitlock, Appellant…

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

2013-UP-492 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-492

12-23-2013

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of O'Bryan B. Whitlock, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-212021

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia; and O'Bryan B. Whitlock, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted December 1, 2013

Appeal From York County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia; and O'Bryan B. Whitlock, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004) (adopting an Anders type procedure for alleged no-merit sexually violent predator involuntary commitment appeals). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.