From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Care and Treatment of Markham

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 6, 2013
2013-UP-096 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-096

03-06-2013

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Quentin D. Markham, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-210428

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted February 1, 2013

Appeal From Greenville County G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Care and Treatment of Markham

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 6, 2013
2013-UP-096 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

In re Care and Treatment of Markham

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Quentin D. Markham, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

2013-UP-096 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2013)